<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: World&#8217;s #1 Feed Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ensight.org/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ensight.org/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m The Boss @ netmobs, past CEO of b5media, author of Blog Marketing and a hardcore Canadian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:21:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Theatre Tickets</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-72011</link>
		<dc:creator>Theatre Tickets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ensight.org/archives/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/#comment-72011</guid>
		<description>A huge thank you to both Google and FeedBurner on this one. With Firefox 2.0 and the integration of the new (and far better) Google Reader with it, I&#039;ve been using it for months but have always been frustrated by the fact the numbers were not being reported. I&#039;ll be curious to see what the undercount has been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge thank you to both Google and FeedBurner on this one. With Firefox 2.0 and the integration of the new (and far better) Google Reader with it, I&#8217;ve been using it for months but have always been frustrated by the fact the numbers were not being reported. I&#8217;ll be curious to see what the undercount has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franky</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-55960</link>
		<dc:creator>franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ensight.org/archives/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/#comment-55960</guid>
		<description>Jeremy, the Google Reader numbers are not really correct. As you mentioned they are not entirely based on subscriptions, but on the number of times Google Reader is the referrer.
This means that added to the number of Google Reader feed subscribers comes the number of clicks to sites within Google Reader.
In praxis : if Scoble links to you today you&#039;ll see a huge shift in your feedburner stats, because many Scoble subscribers will visit your blog from within Google Reader, but only for today and the following days the number will go down again.

But nevertheless Mihai has built a great and successful application. Probably the most popular feed reader atm. But (especially the &lt;em&gt;listers&lt;/em&gt;) we&#039;ll have to observe server stats for many blogs before the real influence of Google Reader can be estimated/calculated.
Of course these numbers are interesting and I wonder if they will lead to a new service online : feedbaiting. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, the Google Reader numbers are not really correct. As you mentioned they are not entirely based on subscriptions, but on the number of times Google Reader is the referrer.<br />
This means that added to the number of Google Reader feed subscribers comes the number of clicks to sites within Google Reader.<br />
In praxis : if Scoble links to you today you&#8217;ll see a huge shift in your feedburner stats, because many Scoble subscribers will visit your blog from within Google Reader, but only for today and the following days the number will go down again.</p>
<p>But nevertheless Mihai has built a great and successful application. Probably the most popular feed reader atm. But (especially the <em>listers</em>) we&#8217;ll have to observe server stats for many blogs before the real influence of Google Reader can be estimated/calculated.<br />
Of course these numbers are interesting and I wonder if they will lead to a new service online : feedbaiting. <img src='http://www.ensight.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timo Heuer</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-55746</link>
		<dc:creator>Timo Heuer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ensight.org/archives/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/#comment-55746</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m one of those Netvibes users. I hate to use Google Reader, because the design is not very effective for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m one of those Netvibes users. I hate to use Google Reader, because the design is not very effective for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-55672</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ensight.org/archives/2007/02/17/google-worlds-1-feed-reader/#comment-55672</guid>
		<description>So that explains why my Feedburner subscribers jumped from 630 yesterday to 830 today.  I used to be a FeedDemon user but since I switched to Mac, I&#039;ve embraced Google Reader (along with everyone else!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that explains why my Feedburner subscribers jumped from 630 yesterday to 830 today.  I used to be a FeedDemon user but since I switched to Mac, I&#8217;ve embraced Google Reader (along with everyone else!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
