More than a year ago now, I was talking about how killer IE7’s tab implementation would be. While the internal tab manager I’d seen isn’t the same as the one that made it’s way to the public eye, many of the key features are still there.
So it’s kind of funny to see the new FireFox “feature list”. I put feature list in quotes both because most of these aren’t 1.0 to 2.0 type features. They’re incremental improvements. And the ones that aren’t? Have been in IE7 for more than 6 months.
Let’s review the list, according to Asa (he of the sharp tongue):
- Inline spell checking
- Search suggestions
- Search plugin management
- Session restore
- Phishing protection
- Improved feed support
- Improved add-ons management
- Bookmarks microsummaries
- Tabbed browsing improvements
I’ve bolded 4 of these. The search stuff’s nice (really, I’ve tried it), and I hope IE does something similar. The session restore’s been in the works for a while and is really just an extension making its way into the core build of FF. Beside that and “improved add-on management”, all of these features are already in IE7
Now I’m not slamming the FireFox team. Innovations in one browser that are actually useful should make their way into other browsers.
I’m simply pointing this out for 2 reasons:
1. Asa has famously decried IE’s phishing protection as (paraphrasing from one dinner with him) “useless, since it’s powered at least partially by static lists”. (of course it’s far more than that, but this was his biggest complaint when someone raised it as a cool IE feature)
2. Asa has publicly stated that IE7’s tabbed browsing is merely a copy/paste of FireFox’s. Of course, every one of the tabbed improvements in FF are ones from IE7. So not sure who’s copying who
At the end of the day, though, any declaration of anyone copying FireFox is funny, since FireFox is really just one big copy/paste from pre-existing browsers (largely Opera, to be fair) out there. It’s a nice browser and all, but those who live in glass houses eventually get pictures posted online of them walking around naked.
And really that’s all this is for. FireFox 2.0 is nice. No, I don’t think it’s worthy of a full x.0 release name (it seems to be largely for PR reasons). And yes I’m glad the features are being worked in.
But this isn’t some major, killer release. IE6 to IE7 is pretty substantial (though not perfect). FF 1.x to 2.0 is… Sad. I was, for months, hoping the 2.0 release would be fairly substantial. However it’s now becoming obvious that the FF team is realizing that they ultimately have two choices now that they’ve solved the “fundamentals”: get bigger or get smaller. Sadly, they seem to be trying to do both with each release. Minor improvements, with one or two “features” (often stolen copied from elsewhere).
They can really only do that for so long before folk realize they’re stagnating. Name one great new feature in FF in the last 12 months.

July 13th, 2006 at 6:43 pm
I think you need to also look at dev cycles. FireFox 1.0 launched in November 2004 and has had an update in the form of 1.5 since the release. Internet Explorer 6 was released in August 2001 and has only gotten security patches since. That’s 5 years of no new features right now and IE 7 isn’t out yet.
So I don’t think it’s fair to compare the point releases of these two, Microsoft has had almost 6 years to work on things. It should be a big update.
I’m looking forward to both updates.
July 13th, 2006 at 6:48 pm
To be fair, there have been more than a dozen releases of IE since 2001. Just not for PC platforms (though IE6 XP SP2 was a major, major overhaul).
I hear what you’re saying, however the reality is that the IE7 team has only been around for a year as well.
Either way, purely from a user perspective, you’d expect 2.0 to be a fairly big leap from 1.5. If nothing else, design-wise, right?
July 13th, 2006 at 10:16 pm
I agree. Which is why I’ve made the switch to Opera 9. It’s beautiful.
July 14th, 2006 at 9:18 am
From the feature list I have seen, calling it 2.0 is a bit of I stretch. I’ll give you that. But it’s not bad marketing, people like seeing updates regularly. If they could just figure out how to leave a little bit of RAM for other applications it would be such a huge update it could skip 2.0 and head right to 3.0.
July 19th, 2006 at 7:41 pm
I too agree that calling it 2.0 is a stretch. On the other hand, I’m glad to see Firefox not changing just for the sake of change. And I’m still using Safari and Camino anyway.
Opera 9 is quite an impressive browser, nevertheless.
Oh, and “Have been in IE7 for more than 6 months” doesn’t quite work. IE7 has not actually been released. Will it and FF 2 come out at the same time in final release? Not sure. But I’m glad to see that Firefox has some decent competition again.
July 23rd, 2006 at 6:36 pm
And some of us just don’t get the choice as M$ now refuse to develop IE on the Mac – good thing though it was always a pig to work with. FF isn’t spectacular on the Mac but it does for when Safari won’t handle a web site.