A Personal Blog
Google Check-Out
I really tried to come up with a snappy title for this. Like “Google Checks Out” or “Checking Out Google” or even “When Did Google Check Out?”.
Nothing stuck. So I’m stealing Mark Evans’ title.
Another week, another weak Google launch. Another round of “this is an [x] killer!“.
Mark’s got a good point:
Not to dismiss Google Checkout’s features, which seem interesting, but when was the last time Google launched a new service that kicked some serious butt?
And he’s right. And I’ll tell you when the last time Google launched a service that actually “killed” anything.
Ready?
AdSense. And before that? Search.
And that, my friends, is it. Those are Google’s only home runs. While Gmail is great, and forced a minor revolution (UI and disk space), the truth is it didn’t “kill” anything. Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail have both seen their numbers go up, not down. Ditto maps. Great UI, awesome API. But I haven’t seen Mapquest, MapPoint or Yahoo Maps fold. Their usage has gone up. Hell, they even all have features that are better than Google Maps now.
I always hate it when people refer to Google apps as “killers”.
The truth is that while Google has some really great ideas, and incremental innovations, and has really knocked it out of the park with 2 of those innovations… They aren’t the kind of company that has yet managed to “kill” anyone. Even in their 2 standout products. And never a major player like PayPal or Ebay or Microsoft or Yahoo.
Google’s a leech. An innovative leech, but a leech nonetheless. They can’t lead. They can’t develop software that gets mass appeal. And they can’t even innovate beyond their first core of ideas that are more than a decade old.
The fact that nobody’s trounced them is really only a reflection on how easily intimidated the competition has become, not on how great a company Google is.
I mean, to put this in perspective, Google now has 500 times as many PhD’s as they had when they hit their last home run. On a cost-per-kill scale, they’re doing piss-poor. No offence to Google, of course ;-)
| Print article | This entry was posted by Jeremy Wright on June 29, 2006 at 10:47 am, and is filed under Business, General, IT Thoughts. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed. |
Comments are closed.
about 5 years ago
Why do they have to ‘kill’ someone to be a success? Microsoft managed to kill Netscape but that didn’t benefit them in the long run.
about 5 years ago
They don’t have to. My point wasn’t that Checkout will or won’t be a “success” (though I could argue that). My point was that the odds of it “killing” anything are slim to nil. Google doesn’t have the track record to sustain the level of hype it currently has.
Though, again, I could make a strong argument that Google as a company is actually a failure.
about 5 years ago
This is strictly anecdotal, but everybody I know uses Google Maps over any of the competition. They may be on the way to owning that category.
about 5 years ago
Darren: That data hasn’t shown up in any of the maps-service data analysis, which shows Google Maps in third place. In fact, they lost marketshare this year.