<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blahnalytics: 48 Hours Later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ensight.org/2005/11/16/blahnalytics-48-hours-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ensight.org/2005/11/16/blahnalytics-48-hours-later/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m The Boss @ netmobs, past CEO of b5media, author of Blog Marketing and a hardcore Canadian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:21:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Barac</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2005/11/16/blahnalytics-48-hours-later/comment-page-1/#comment-48277</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Barac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ensight.org/archives/2005/11/16/blahnalytics-48-hours-later/#comment-48277</guid>
		<description>I have very serious reservations about both the privacy relating to GA and about the quality of service offerred. It took me 48 hours to get my first stats and once I reviewed them they were not all that different to what I can get elsewhere. 

What concerns me most is how Google will use the stats to classify (read: downgrade/upgrade) sites that use adsense, and how it will impact PR&#039;s.

I have removed the code from my sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have very serious reservations about both the privacy relating to GA and about the quality of service offerred. It took me 48 hours to get my first stats and once I reviewed them they were not all that different to what I can get elsewhere. </p>
<p>What concerns me most is how Google will use the stats to classify (read: downgrade/upgrade) sites that use adsense, and how it will impact PR&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I have removed the code from my sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonic</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2005/11/16/blahnalytics-48-hours-later/comment-page-1/#comment-48264</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ensight.org/archives/2005/11/16/blahnalytics-48-hours-later/#comment-48264</guid>
		<description>I was really excited when I saw Google were offering free website stats (and about time too), but like yourself I was pretty dissapointed at the strength of the product upon actually logging on.

I&#039;ve got my stats now (and they&#039;re back dated to when I signed up on Monday), but I would have like things to be a little more, you know, instant. This &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the information age we&#039;re living in. Almost everything is instantly available to us. It&#039;s just odd that Google, who are usually pioneering the technologies that truly &lt;em&gt;define&lt;/em&gt; &#039;the information age&#039;, completely ballsed this one up.

I love what Google do and are doing, but like I would be with anyone else I&#039;m not going to be polite to them if they mess up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really excited when I saw Google were offering free website stats (and about time too), but like yourself I was pretty dissapointed at the strength of the product upon actually logging on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got my stats now (and they&#8217;re back dated to when I signed up on Monday), but I would have like things to be a little more, you know, instant. This <em>is</em> the information age we&#8217;re living in. Almost everything is instantly available to us. It&#8217;s just odd that Google, who are usually pioneering the technologies that truly <em>define</em> &#8216;the information age&#8217;, completely ballsed this one up.</p>
<p>I love what Google do and are doing, but like I would be with anyone else I&#8217;m not going to be polite to them if they mess up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
