I’ve just unsubscribed from every A-List blogger I read.
This includes Scoble specifically. See, this post was going to just be about Scoble, but I realized the reasons I was unsubscribing from his blog are valid across the blogosphere.
I consider Scoble a friend. Not a closer personal friend, but the kind I enjoy grabbing lunch with when I’m in Redmond, and the kind it’s fun to chat with whenever we both have time. It’s not like I make time in my week (or month) to talk to him, but he’s one of the reasons I started blogging…
… Which is one of the reasons this is hard.
You see, over the last 6 months, I can count on one hand the number of posts on Scoble’s blog that I actually enjoyed, truly read or got any real value from.
This isn’t his fault, really. His style was almost always “link to the best stuff, talk about the worst”. But the problem is that now that I’m connected, I get most of this info first. It’s kind of like Slashdot. In the good old days (ahem), it was one of the best sources for geek news. You put up with the roudy comments because it was always timely.
But now I get news faster than Slashdot, so I barely read it. It’s similar with Scoble.
The value in Scoble’s blog was always:
1. It’s Scoble
2. He was always brutally honest
3. He was humble
The problem, for me as a reader, is that this equation has changed. There ain’t much Scoble in there anymore. And while he’s still honest (ie: he’s not lying), his honesty now often comes across as defending Microsoft. Not always, by any stretch, but it does happen quite a bit. When he feels something’s off, he’ll still happily say so, though, so it’s not like he’s a shill. But, he has been affected by working at Microsoft.
Which is fair enough. Anyone who spends more than an hour there gets affected by it.
My real problem with Robert, and the A-List overall, is the #3 area. It wouldn’t be fair for me to say anyone isn’t humble. That’d be arrogance. But, Robert’s humility has definitely taken a different form lately. He’ll still apologize when he’s wrong. But, it’s changed.
I won’t go into why it’s changed, nor will I say Robert’s a bad blogger or a bad person. He’s a great person. Anyone who’s met him in person knows that the guy who appears on the front of scoble.weblogs.com is not the same guy you sit across the table from at Crossroads and talk about cool geeky stuff with. In person, Robert’s still mostly the same old guy.
So, I can’t really fault him.
But as a reader, I’m not finding value anymore in his posts or in most of the A-List’s bloggers I read’s posts. I love Doc’s blog. But beyond that, it’s kind of like Slashdot: the posts that are really valuable will get linked to by someone else.
It’s like the reverse A-List. A-Listers always say “if you want me to blog about your post, get others to blog about it”. Well, now I’m saying it back.
Again, I’m not unsubscribing as a friend. Robert’s a fantastic guy. I’m just unsubscribing as a blogger.
Maybe I’ll be back. Or maybe I’ll just read once in a while while eating breakfast (like I do Dave Winer’s blog, having never subscribed to it).
Either way, I’m done.
Maybe you, too, should re-evaluate your blog reading habits. If you don’t actually find value here, feel free to unsubscribe. Don’t worry, I won’t be offended. Feel free to subscribe if you want to, or if you feel like there’s still enough “Jeremy” here. But if there isn’t, or you’re only reading because you’ve always read or because it seemed like a cool thing to do at the time, feel free to re-think that choice.
Blogging’s about relationships, about value, about authenticity and about authority.
If we can’t be honest and only read the blogs where we find value (personal value, professional value or informational value), there’s a real problem.
I’ve got a post half-written which talks about this in some more depth, but the gist of this long post is simple: I, as a reader (not as a friend), am no longer finding value in Scoble or the A-List.
#1 by John (SYNTAGMA) - August 1st, 2005 at 09:59
I agree that many A-lister do become parodies of themselves. That’s normal for any of us if we do something long enough and have a measure of success. It’s easy to slip into the ruts of past successes. On Scoble, I’ve not been reading him long, but I recognize what you say about humility and honesty. Personally, I find his blog, Scobleizer, stimulating, and I’m blogging on the topic of the IE7 spat right now on SYNTAGMA. Other A-listers though can be a bit hard to take, especially when they consistently make references to events and people that only a tight group of “in” readers will know about. Freshness is all in blogging, and for that you need to scout around quite a bit. One thing good about A-listers though, is that they generally write from inside the tent, so you’re getting the buzz first hand.
#2 by Jeremy Wright - August 1st, 2005 at 10:07
Scoble’s good at what he does, as he always has been. I’m just not sure I’m finding value where I’m at.
I started reading him almost 3 years ago. At some point you need to re-evaluate those older reading relationships and figure out if they’re still serving you.
After all, that’s one of the foundational bits of blogging and RSS: you read what you want, when you want it.
So I shouldn’t feel bad about unsubscribing from blogs by the droves. But, I do.
It’s an addiction. And one I’m planning to address over the coming weeks.
#3 by John (SYNTAGMA) - August 1st, 2005 at 10:17
I had a complete clearout of Bloglines recently, then slipped back into reading about half of them. So I know now these are the blogs I really do get value from.
On blog addiction, it’s true, I can easily spend a whole day surfing, commenting, posting et al. This takes me away from my other writing, so has to be curbed. Interesting topic.
#4 by chrispian - August 1st, 2005 at 10:56
I’ve never really been a big fan of “A-List” reading. Some of them are great writers, but if they write something interesting one of the B, C or D list writers that I do read will link it. I didn’t make this decision on purpose, it was something that I realized after looking at my list. It’s time once again to cull the herd though.
#5 by Jeremy Wright - August 1st, 2005 at 11:02
Chrispian: Exactly. The A-List mentality is “if it’s good enough, someone else’ll find it”. Well, I think that’s my little C-List mentality too. If the A-List are good enough, one of the other folk on the C-List’ll link to ‘em.
#6 by John (SYNTAGMA) - August 1st, 2005 at 12:27
From Doc Searl’s blog :: Quote du jour : Tom McMahon: I found that Self-Referential Quid Pro Quo stuff ungodly boring and nauseating.
- About following A-list bloggers.
#7 by Jeremy Wright - August 1st, 2005 at 12:32
Here’s the link to Tom’s post: http://www.tommcmahon.net/2005/07/the_alist_blogg.html
#8 by Scott - August 1st, 2005 at 13:21
“Anyone whoÕs met him in person knows that the guy who appears on the front of scoble.weblogs.com is not the same guy you sit across the table from at Crossroads and talk about cool geeky stuff with. In person, RobertÕs still mostly the same old guy.”
You know, I almost posted something similar over int he comments onsome of his latest posts. He seems to take a harder line FOR MS, and in general, on his blog than he does in person. He’s more defensive on his blog. That’s one thing that really sucks about blogs, there’s no way to convey a tone of voice. Smileys are a lame attempt at that, but they don’t really work all of the time. If I write “Jeremy, you don’t know what you’re talking about” you’re much more likely to be offended than if I were to say that to you in person. Because my body language and tone of voice would convey to you that I’m kidding.
I also unsubscribed a while ago. He’s kind of in the same que as WIner for me. I’ll occasionally check their web site, but their not really worth subscribing to. I still leave comments from time to time.
#9 by richard - August 1st, 2005 at 14:26
There’s only so much blogging about blogging that I can take, and only so much onanistic meta talk that a person can take… it’s why I can’t listen to Adam Curry’s podcasts anymore, and why I can’t read Dave Winer anymore…
It’s sad when the A-list is a lot of talking about talking without ever saying anything. I prefer seeing and reading things that add to the conversation as opposed to things that just let you know that, somewhere, someone else is having a conversation.
Meta-blogging is mostly bullshit
There are times that I thought it’d be nice to be on the A-list, as people would know my name, or I might reach even double-digit Feedburner subs, but it involved drinking the Koolaid, and I don’t think I’m up to that.
#10 by Robert Scoble - August 1st, 2005 at 14:29
You know, you’re right. And you sensed something deeper. I’m not having fun anymore. I’m taking a week off. Then changes are ahead.
Translation: I unsubscribed from myself.
#11 by Jeremy Wright - August 1st, 2005 at 14:36
Scoble: Week off sounds good. Enjoy
#12 by Scott - August 1st, 2005 at 14:59
hehe, hopefully you started your week off on Friday Robert so you had a nice weekend! Now it’s cloudy here.
Drive out to the winerys in eastern WA Robert. Take your son to the hydroboat races. Enjoy.
#13 by Duncan Riley - August 2nd, 2005 at 03:23
Looking at who your describing Scoble and I thikn the correct words are he’s become defensive and reactionary (the Register stuff comes to mind) Whilst he’s still honest etc.. the old Scoble in relation to his relaxed nature and more enjoyable pace of blogging has changed. Scoble, I think its good your taking a break, I think its probably needed.
#14 by Gordon - August 2nd, 2005 at 05:17
What makes an A-list blog though? In the past it was always content but, as you say, many of the A-list are now being caught up and overtaken yet still they are considered the A-list. Maybe we should ALL unsubscribe them and start a fresh. As John says, those blogs you go back to are the ones that YOU value, that fall into YOUR A-list.
Of course to people who are new to blogging, the A-list are the most visible and so grab the lions’ share of the links, and so perpetuate the notion that they are A-list. This is common across most blogging areas, whether niche (scoble, winer, zeldman etc) or general (kottke).
#15 by Duncan Riley - August 2nd, 2005 at 05:25
Gordon, I think your missing the historical nature of the A-List, in that many of them have been around a long time, and just unsubcribing from their feeds will make no difference because the nature of the links are not only from say a navigation bar, but also within posts within a blog. If I was to de-link Scoble for example from The Blog Herald for example, I’d need to track down every time I’ve linked to his blog in the last 2 and a bit years, and I’m not willing nor wanting to pursue this course of action. What you will find though, as time progresses, is that new “A-List” members will emerge as they grow more popular and surpass some of the older crowd, and yet some will stay right where they are.
#16 by PXLated - August 3rd, 2005 at 22:16
I’m another “A” list un-subscriber, except Doc
———-
On Scoble…I’ve never met him but do believe he’s probably a very nice guy. But as others have noted, he has changed and I think he defends the big “M” to strenuously and probably unjustifiably of late. Someone left a comment in one of the hot comment threads that Robert is a great “blogger” but a lousy “debater”. I think they nailed it.