Comments on: Useless Ensight Stats http://www.ensight.org/2005/01/useless-ensight-stats/ A Personal Blog Mon, 07 May 2012 18:40:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jeremy C. Wright http://www.ensight.org/2005/01/useless-ensight-stats/#comment-5074 Jeremy C. Wright Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:57:31 +0000 /?p=1711#comment-5074 Not really sure why my BlogLines stats are so "low", however most A Listers (the real ones, of which I'm not) have between 500-2000 BlogLines subscribers. I've been watching that number go up every day though, so maybe I'll hit 500 at some point :) I actually believe the PubSub ranking is the most accurate one available, because it uses a Google-esque method: your ranking isn't based on the number of people who link to you, it's based on how popular each of the people who link to you are. It's the closest thing the blogosphere currently has to measuring how influencial a blogger is and, crazily, somehow I'm in the top thousand. So, no, that doesn't translate directly to BlogLines subscribers. But then I don't know what does translate to BlogLines subscribers. Not really sure why my BlogLines stats are so “low”, however most A Listers (the real ones, of which I’m not) have between 500-2000 BlogLines subscribers. I’ve been watching that number go up every day though, so maybe I’ll hit 500 at some point :)

I actually believe the PubSub ranking is the most accurate one available, because it uses a Google-esque method: your ranking isn’t based on the number of people who link to you, it’s based on how popular each of the people who link to you are.

It’s the closest thing the blogosphere currently has to measuring how influencial a blogger is and, crazily, somehow I’m in the top thousand.

So, no, that doesn’t translate directly to BlogLines subscribers. But then I don’t know what does translate to BlogLines subscribers.

]]> By: James Tauber http://www.ensight.org/2005/01/useless-ensight-stats/#comment-5073 James Tauber Fri, 21 Jan 2005 02:50:06 +0000 /?p=1711#comment-5073 I've posted a comparison with my own stats at <a href="http://jtauber.com/blog/2005/01/20/comparison_with_a-list_blogger" rel="nofollow">http://jtauber.com/blog/2005/01/20/comparison_with_a-list_blogger</a>. But one stat that surprised me was one I looked up myself: Bloglines subscribers. Your 207 seems low given your other stats. Do your readers just happen to not use Bloglines? Anyway, I thought it was interesting :-) I’ve posted a comparison with my own stats at http://jtauber.com/blog/2005/01/20/comparison_with_a-list_blogger.

But one stat that surprised me was one I looked up myself: Bloglines subscribers. Your 207 seems low given your other stats. Do your readers just happen to not use Bloglines?

Anyway, I thought it was interesting :-)

]]> By: pc4media http://www.ensight.org/2005/01/useless-ensight-stats/#comment-5072 pc4media Fri, 21 Jan 2005 01:31:29 +0000 /?p=1711#comment-5072 <strong>Jeremy Wright</strong> I just got off of an hour long conversation with Jeremy Wright. Jeremy Wright
I just got off of an hour long conversation with Jeremy Wright.

]]> By: Ingoal http://www.ensight.org/2005/01/useless-ensight-stats/#comment-5071 Ingoal Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:05:08 +0000 /?p=1711#comment-5071 Useless stats, maybe, but nontheless interesting and groovy! Top 500...crazy! Useless stats, maybe, but nontheless interesting and groovy! Top 500…crazy!

]]> By: Clete R. Blackwell 2 http://www.ensight.org/2005/01/useless-ensight-stats/#comment-5070 Clete R. Blackwell 2 Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:33:32 +0000 /?p=1711#comment-5070 Wow. That's great. Top 500. I don't feel like mentioning the numbers of the domains I typed in for PubSub ;). Wow. That’s great. Top 500. I don’t feel like mentioning the numbers of the domains I typed in for PubSub ;).

]]>