<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Poke Sun Micrososystems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/how-to-poke-sun-micrososystems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/how-to-poke-sun-micrososystems/</link>
	<description>A Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/how-to-poke-sun-micrososystems/#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>medicine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1648#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;medicine&lt;/strong&gt;
You can also visit some helpful info in the field of medicine skin care products</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>medicine</strong><br />
You can also visit some helpful info in the field of medicine skin care products</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Back</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/how-to-poke-sun-micrososystems/#comment-4698</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 04:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1648#comment-4698</guid>
		<description>As far as I know, the Solaris Kernel doesn&#039;t have much to offer.  Windows is far far advanced in its development and won&#039;t probably even get a new idea, and linux is close behind... what&#039;s the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, the Solaris Kernel doesn&#8217;t have much to offer.  Windows is far far advanced in its development and won&#8217;t probably even get a new idea, and linux is close behind&#8230; what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/how-to-poke-sun-micrososystems/#comment-4697</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1648#comment-4697</guid>
		<description>Last I and others used Solaris, it was a dinosaur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I and others used Solaris, it was a dinosaur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/how-to-poke-sun-micrososystems/#comment-4696</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1648#comment-4696</guid>
		<description>Speaking of which, we have a second opinion:
http://news.com.com/Torvalds+A+Solaris+skeptic/2008-1082_3-5498799.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of which, we have a second opinion:<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/Torvalds+A+Solaris+skeptic/2008-1082_3-5498799.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/Torvalds+A+Solaris+skeptic/2008-1082_3-5498799.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Pierzchala</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/how-to-poke-sun-micrososystems/#comment-4695</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Pierzchala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1648#comment-4695</guid>
		<description>And if I install Solaris 10 on my laptop, it will play music, give me a pretty GUI, burn CDs, play DVDs, and handle my wireless network card with ABSOLUTELY no problems...right?

I like Linux. But these are things that even Linux has difficulties with still. If Solaris thinks that they are going to break out of their server niche anytime soon, they have finally gone mad.

It is interesting to see one of the original Internet-ready companies not get it anymore.

smp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if I install Solaris 10 on my laptop, it will play music, give me a pretty GUI, burn CDs, play DVDs, and handle my wireless network card with ABSOLUTELY no problems&#8230;right?</p>
<p>I like Linux. But these are things that even Linux has difficulties with still. If Solaris thinks that they are going to break out of their server niche anytime soon, they have finally gone mad.</p>
<p>It is interesting to see one of the original Internet-ready companies not get it anymore.</p>
<p>smp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/how-to-poke-sun-micrososystems/#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1648#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>Dunno, Jer.  I&#039;m with you.  There&#039;s nothing remarkable about Solaris, unless you&#039;re running it on big iron (ie partitioning and that).  At that point, Open Source don&#039;t mean squat.  Open Sourcing Solaris seems more like jumping the shark than a savvy product development decision.  This is the same company that tried to get rid of their x86 version a couple of years ago.

Looking back, I made the following comment in Dec 2002:

Sun Microsystems. Are they going down the
hole? No. But, out of all the proprietary UNIXes out there, I think Solaris has the most likelihood of losing market share to Linux. They&#039;re quite similar. SUN hardware is expensive (not that HP and IBM hardware isn&#039;t). Sean&#039;s prediction? There&#039;s
going to be a big shakeup at Sun sometime in 2003.

http://ertw.com/~sean/news/Dec-19-2002.html

Who am I to say, though?  I still like to think that any open source is good.  Prove the two of us wrong, SUN, and make OpenSolaris a success.

Sean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno, Jer.  I&#8217;m with you.  There&#8217;s nothing remarkable about Solaris, unless you&#8217;re running it on big iron (ie partitioning and that).  At that point, Open Source don&#8217;t mean squat.  Open Sourcing Solaris seems more like jumping the shark than a savvy product development decision.  This is the same company that tried to get rid of their x86 version a couple of years ago.</p>
<p>Looking back, I made the following comment in Dec 2002:</p>
<p>Sun Microsystems. Are they going down the<br />
hole? No. But, out of all the proprietary UNIXes out there, I think Solaris has the most likelihood of losing market share to Linux. They&#8217;re quite similar. SUN hardware is expensive (not that HP and IBM hardware isn&#8217;t). Sean&#8217;s prediction? There&#8217;s<br />
going to be a big shakeup at Sun sometime in 2003.</p>
<p><a href="http://ertw.com/~sean/news/Dec-19-2002.html" rel="nofollow">http://ertw.com/~sean/news/Dec-19-2002.html</a></p>
<p>Who am I to say, though?  I still like to think that any open source is good.  Prove the two of us wrong, SUN, and make OpenSolaris a success.</p>
<p>Sean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

