<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desktop Search Security Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/desktop-search-security-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/desktop-search-security-response/</link>
	<description>A Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Giagnocavo</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/desktop-search-security-response/#comment-4670</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Giagnocavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1644#comment-4670</guid>
		<description>If Google indexes encrypted pages, it means IE is already saving them to your hard drive. You already have a problem; DS is just showing it to you. To ignore this and continue on is like not locking your back door, and then saying you don&#039;t have a back door.

Google&#039;s issue is perhaps related to that the use a web server/browser interface? :S Desktop search shouldn&#039;t be opening ports on your machine, duh. But that&#039;s an implementation detail, not a fundamental issue with all DS engines.

If someone is on your computer, what&#039;s to stop them from installing some search engine, and THEN searching?

I have a keylogger on my machine. I leave it off most of the time (it&#039;s handy when someone (ISP) comes to configure equipment using my machine). I&#039;m not worried about it being used against me, because A) I don&#039;t let people on my machine, and B) If they are, they could go install a keylogger anyways. Having it on my hard drive is such a trivial benefit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google indexes encrypted pages, it means IE is already saving them to your hard drive. You already have a problem; DS is just showing it to you. To ignore this and continue on is like not locking your back door, and then saying you don&#8217;t have a back door.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s issue is perhaps related to that the use a web server/browser interface? :S Desktop search shouldn&#8217;t be opening ports on your machine, duh. But that&#8217;s an implementation detail, not a fundamental issue with all DS engines.</p>
<p>If someone is on your computer, what&#8217;s to stop them from installing some search engine, and THEN searching?</p>
<p>I have a keylogger on my machine. I leave it off most of the time (it&#8217;s handy when someone (ISP) comes to configure equipment using my machine). I&#8217;m not worried about it being used against me, because A) I don&#8217;t let people on my machine, and B) If they are, they could go install a keylogger anyways. Having it on my hard drive is such a trivial benefit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy C. Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/desktop-search-security-response/#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy C. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1644#comment-4669</guid>
		<description>Jonathan: Yep, I&#039;d seen that just before I posted this (and sent the email).

Vinnie: Security vs functionality is a balance we try and play. With this first version of the software, we&#039;re confident in this decision. We&#039;re hopeful, though that the core issues surrounding DS get solved so that we CAN widely deploy it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan: Yep, I&#8217;d seen that just before I posted this (and sent the email).</p>
<p>Vinnie: Security vs functionality is a balance we try and play. With this first version of the software, we&#8217;re confident in this decision. We&#8217;re hopeful, though that the core issues surrounding DS get solved so that we CAN widely deploy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/desktop-search-security-response/#comment-4668</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1644#comment-4668</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re smoking some cheap crack ;).

I can see where you&#039;re coming from though. However, desktop search solves problems (where DID that document go?) for the very people you are advising not to use it. I get the feeling you&#039;re going to have an uphill battle to fight in terms of not seeing this installed on PCs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re smoking some cheap crack ;).</p>
<p>I can see where you&#8217;re coming from though. However, desktop search solves problems (where DID that document go?) for the very people you are advising not to use it. I get the feeling you&#8217;re going to have an uphill battle to fight in terms of not seeing this installed on PCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hardwick [MSFT]</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/desktop-search-security-response/#comment-4667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hardwick [MSFT]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1644#comment-4667</guid>
		<description>Joe Wilcox of Microsoft Monitor has a post up today about desktop search security - http://www.microsoftmonitor.com/archives/005539.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Wilcox of Microsoft Monitor has a post up today about desktop search security &#8211; <a href="http://www.microsoftmonitor.com/archives/005539.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoftmonitor.com/archives/005539.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ensight - Jeremy C. Wright &#187; The Whole Story (&#8230; or as much as I know anyways)</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/12/desktop-search-security-response/#comment-4671</link>
		<dc:creator>Ensight - Jeremy C. Wright &#187; The Whole Story (&#8230; or as much as I know anyways)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1644#comment-4671</guid>
		<description>[...] nd that might fall into that category were two security responses to our auditor (here and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ensight.org/archives/2004/12/20/desktop-search-security-response/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  	I had approval for the first one. I inferred it for the sec [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nd that might fall into that category were two security responses to our auditor (here and <a href="http://www.ensight.org/archives/2004/12/20/desktop-search-security-response/" rel="nofollow">here</a>).  	I had approval for the first one. I inferred it for the sec [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

