Comments on: MSN Search is XHTML http://www.ensight.org/2004/11/msn-search-is-xhtml/ A Personal Blog Mon, 07 May 2012 18:40:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bryan Loeper http://www.ensight.org/2004/11/msn-search-is-xhtml/#comment-4203 Bryan Loeper Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:52:16 +0000 /?p=1567#comment-4203 They're down to one error! They’re down to one error!

]]> By: Jeremy C. Wright http://www.ensight.org/2004/11/msn-search-is-xhtml/#comment-4202 Jeremy C. Wright Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:49:56 +0000 /?p=1567#comment-4202 Damn skippy, I never claimed otherwise. I've VERY happy with the look of Ensight, but I definitely want it to validate and be more accessible for it's next design sometime next year. Damn skippy, I never claimed otherwise. I’ve VERY happy with the look of Ensight, but I definitely want it to validate and be more accessible for it’s next design sometime next year.

]]> By: G http://www.ensight.org/2004/11/msn-search-is-xhtml/#comment-4201 G Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:43:46 +0000 /?p=1567#comment-4201 Uh oh: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional! Errors: 379! <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ensight.org&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=%28detect+automatically%29" rel="nofollow">Ensight.org</a> Uh oh:
This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Errors: 379!
Ensight.org

]]> By: Bryan Loeper http://www.ensight.org/2004/11/msn-search-is-xhtml/#comment-4200 Bryan Loeper Mon, 29 Nov 2004 01:49:33 +0000 /?p=1567#comment-4200 <em>Actually</em>, they only sport three errors. The W3C's validator has a list of four, but item three is just to let you know where the other half of the duplicate in item two could be found. So they have an invalid attribute, a duplicate id, and a form that's lacking a block level container inside it. Not bad, I'd say. Actually, they only sport three errors. The W3C’s validator has a list of four, but item three is just to let you know where the other half of the duplicate in item two could be found. So they have an invalid attribute, a duplicate id, and a form that’s lacking a block level container inside it. Not bad, I’d say.

]]> By: Nathan Wong http://www.ensight.org/2004/11/msn-search-is-xhtml/#comment-4199 Nathan Wong Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:51:43 +0000 /?p=1567#comment-4199 Sure is :) Sure is :)

]]> By: Jeremy C. Wright http://www.ensight.org/2004/11/msn-search-is-xhtml/#comment-4198 Jeremy C. Wright Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:50:39 +0000 /?p=1567#comment-4198 Is that better? Is that better?

]]> By: Nathan Wong http://www.ensight.org/2004/11/msn-search-is-xhtml/#comment-4197 Nathan Wong Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:47:45 +0000 /?p=1567#comment-4197 Yikes, formatting errors at Ensight... might wanna edit that, Jeremy. Kinda interesting that they've actually got a doctype. All for publicity ;) Yikes, formatting errors at Ensight… might wanna edit that, Jeremy.

Kinda interesting that they’ve actually got a doctype. All for publicity ;)

]]>