<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Apprentice 2 &#8211; Week 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ensight.org/2004/09/the-apprentice-2-week-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/09/the-apprentice-2-week-2/</link>
	<description>A Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/09/the-apprentice-2-week-2/#comment-3260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1365#comment-3260</guid>
		<description>Who needs to worry about laws when you&#039;ve got The Donald on your back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs to worry about laws when you&#8217;ve got The Donald on your back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/09/the-apprentice-2-week-2/#comment-3259</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1365#comment-3259</guid>
		<description>The women sure are a bunch of back-stabbers.

Raj and Kelly (Mosaic PM) were great.

Mr. No-Breakfast-Tough-Shxt sure was an ass.

Weren&#039;t the team breaking laws by not obtaining vendors (and other?) permits and not collecting sales tax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The women sure are a bunch of back-stabbers.</p>
<p>Raj and Kelly (Mosaic PM) were great.</p>
<p>Mr. No-Breakfast-Tough-Shxt sure was an ass.</p>
<p>Weren&#8217;t the team breaking laws by not obtaining vendors (and other?) permits and not collecting sales tax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bourne</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/09/the-apprentice-2-week-2/#comment-3258</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1365#comment-3258</guid>
		<description>Kill his company eh.  I guess company execs get immunity from shareholders these days :rolleyes:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kill his company eh.  I guess company execs get immunity from shareholders these days :rolleyes:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy C. Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/09/the-apprentice-2-week-2/#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy C. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1365#comment-3257</guid>
		<description>Would it have been better if he&#039;d actually stuck up for himself? Probably. Would it have been better if it was a group of guys? Almost definitely. Would it have been better later in the game where people are a little resentful of folk with &quot;immunity&quot;? Hell yeah.

It was a stupid move on this team, at this time and without a plan. He deserved to get fired... But Ivana and Stacie deserved to get fired a hell of a lot more.

(oops, I need to shut up, eh?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it have been better if he&#8217;d actually stuck up for himself? Probably. Would it have been better if it was a group of guys? Almost definitely. Would it have been better later in the game where people are a little resentful of folk with &#8220;immunity&#8221;? Hell yeah.</p>
<p>It was a stupid move on this team, at this time and without a plan. He deserved to get fired&#8230; But Ivana and Stacie deserved to get fired a hell of a lot more.</p>
<p>(oops, I need to shut up, eh?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.ensight.org/2004/09/the-apprentice-2-week-2/#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 12:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1365#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>Can you say &quot;employment at will&quot;?  I would have defended the decision by saying I want my &quot;employment&quot; or continued existance to be at will not secured by tenure or by some artificial safe period based upon past performance.  How is that a life altering mistake?  Some Donald believes to his use all possible opportunities (such as protection or subsidies by the government) to gain the advntage.  Playing fair (and probably rightly so in cutthroat real estate) is not in the Donald&#039;s vocabulary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you say &#8220;employment at will&#8221;?  I would have defended the decision by saying I want my &#8220;employment&#8221; or continued existance to be at will not secured by tenure or by some artificial safe period based upon past performance.  How is that a life altering mistake?  Some Donald believes to his use all possible opportunities (such as protection or subsidies by the government) to gain the advntage.  Playing fair (and probably rightly so in cutthroat real estate) is not in the Donald&#8217;s vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

