Archive for September, 2004

How Should I Pose?

The photographer for my article in the National Post will be here today… I’ve never done a photo shoot. I’m a bit nervous, to be honest. Ah well, hopefully I can find a copy of the National Post so I can have the article framed or bronzed or something.

Some More Quotes

I won’t be able to keep doing this regularly, and I apologize if it seems like I’m blowing my own horn. I’m not. Loads of traffic is coming to Ensight, and it’s coming from links. So I figure the least I can do is point to some of the cool folk talking about this in different ways.

From Wayne:

A second reason, which is related to the first, is the simple fact that blogs are valued monetarily, and are therefore considered a legitimate business. Those blog critics who considered blogs to be a mere fad or hobby, and little more than an “online diary”, might have to dine on a certain black feathered bird.

Heh.

From Trudy:

I do expect to hear a howl of protest from the blog purists, those who insist the air of commerce should never defile any blog, but I figure blogs in general are well on the way toward defining the term, variety.

Yup. I’m not saying every blog needs to make money. I’m not even saying most blogs should make money. But many blogs are delivery systems for very high quality content. They are topical, they are recognized in their industry and they are authoritative. Those are the kinds of blogs which, to me, have solid and serious value. Most of them well beyond Ensight’s value.

Update: And, from ProBlogger:

In a sense what we’re talking about here is ‘blog farming’. Similarly to my grandfather who farmed cattle and sheep – he would breed them, fatten them up and then sell them at market – I wonder if we’ll start seeing more bloggers taking a similar approach with their blogs.

Could be fun. I used to “farm” websites as a part-time job. It was fun. A bit stressful, but fun.

From Scrivs:

Remember though that the deal includes monthly payments to Jeremy to continue writing, but seeing how the deal is limited to $15,000 then it seems Jeremy will only blog for a fixed amount of time. Not knowing the details of the complete deal makes this hard to tell whether if it was worthwhile for either party.

The value of the “deal” is based on a 1-year commitment. Beyond that it’ll depend how the relationship is going and what else is on the table. At that point I will have been writing Ensight for nearly 2.5 years. Which isn’t a bad time to re-evaluate where I’m at. If I’m still happy, I’m sure I’ll stay on.

This deal is worthwhile for me because it allows me to concentrate on writing and to help my family. The buyer feels it’s worthwhile for them. I guess ultimately time will tell :)

This should be an interesting week as blogs tend to pick up what the media does, and vice versa.

The Press Smells A Story (Continued)

Following on from my quick note yesterday that the press are starting to wake up to this Ensight thing, I did a phone interview last night with a reporter from Canwest Global who own a chunk of the big papers here in Canada. The story should run in most of their papers on Saturday, so if you’re in one of the target newspapers feel free to pick up a copy and scan it in for me :)

Here are the papers, and here are the biggies:

National Post Montreal Gazette Ottawa Citizen Windsor Star Regina Leader-Post Saskatoon StarPhoenix Calgary Herald Edmonton Journal Vancouver Sun Vancouver Province Victoria Times-Colonist

I’ve also got a phone interview with the Globe & Mail this weekend sometime, as well as the phone interview with Blogosphere Radio tomorrow.

I’m figuring on Lockergnome picking it up (ahem, feel free to anyone since I don’t think it’s appropriate for me to do it) and then eventually for Slashdot to pick it up.

Thankfully the interviews are only partially about me. Mainly they’re about the way that blogs are evolving into real quality content sources and that blogs have a real value proposition. That’s why I’m excited about this exposure.

The Press Smells A Story

Hmm… Apparently the sale of Ensight is starting to heat up in terms of exposure. I’m still hoping for a Slashdotting at some point, but having 2 national Canadian newspapers contact you is cool. I’ll be doing interviews this week, to appear in their internal syndication networks this weekend. Hopefully a few of the papers pick it up as there is a real value proposition in blogs, and the only way to build awareness of blogs as business tools is to have these types of events get publicity.

I’ll also be interviewing for Blogosphere Radio sometime in the next couple of weeks. I’m actually quite looking forward to that, as their last episodes have been fun, wholesome and full of penguins. I like penguins.

CSI: NY Review

Okay, Aaron liked it. That helps, because his review gave me some perspective:

CSI:NY brings a new element to the table – Psychological Thriller.

Okay, if that’s what it’s aiming for, great.

Let’s go back a bit though, back to the pilot review that was launched from CSI: Miami:

Okay, the show’s over, and you know what? I’m really not thrilled. The characters were subdued, the fancy tricks were getting old and the plot was hard to follow. Oh, and what was with the forced one-line conversations? “Miss moppet got him hard” “Yeah, he likes his tricks with a candle stick” “One word” “Blow” “Yeah”.

I think a large part of my distaste stems from the fact that picking New York seems like such a copout. They can play to all the stereo types, say “ahh… New York” 20 times and just ride the wave.

I’ll also ignore the fact that the other CSI’s weren’t in New York for a reason: New York has been overdone for crime stuff.

So, how was the show? It was a hell of a lot better than the pilot. The forced lines weren’t there. There wasn’t a single “only in New York” type line either.

That said, I don’t feel it stayed true to CSI or to crime dramas in general and, as a series opener, I felt it was too much too soon. At least for me.

CSI (and L&O to a lesser extent) both value one thing above all else: the chain of evidence. No conclusion is allowed unless there is evidence to support it. No premise is allowed unless the evidence leads you there. And no hunch can be followed without some kind of evidence to back it up.

So, what happens? Girls are murdered. They follow the evidence to the primary location of the murders. The only evidence they find there is some semen. They eventually tie the semen to one of the girls’ uncles. He’s a mad scientist. But they can’t prove he did anything to the girls, and he doesn’t admit to it. The episode ends.

So… They found the bad guy (probably). He’s never lead away to jail. And even if he was there isn’t enough to convict him anyways because his semen is only in the house (he was renting) and not in or on any of the girls.

Grr…

Aaron says this isn’t about the legal aspect so much as the Psychological aspect. I can buy that. I didn’t like the show because of it, but maybe if I watch next week I can do so with a more open mind. It was better than the pilot. But it really didn’t feel like either of the other CSI’s.

I’m willing to give it a second shot, but only because the other two are so good.