A Personal Blog
GoogleBlog Editing Already
In a sad move reeking of corporate censorship and ‘need to know’, Google edited a recent blog entry.
I’ll quote Mark Pilgrim on this because he summarizes the issue nicely:
Briefly seen on Google Blog:
Interestingly, when we announced our engineering center in Bangalore, we found ourselves knee-deep in the debate about “outsourcing” — the practice of cutting a company’s American operations in favor of cheaper labor elsewhere. India in particular has been a subject of a lot of press coverage on this topic lately, which we find to be pretty unfair. It’s not their fault they have a lot of brilliant computer scientists who don’t care to relocate to the States.
The paragraph has since been deleted without explanation.
This kind of revisionist history is unacceptable, regardless of who does it. If you don’t want it saved for all time, don’t publish it on the Internet. Putting blog on the top of the page does not absolve you of all responsibility.
If Google is unable to hold themselves accountable, others will surely do it for them.
Via Slashdot, MetaFilter, and Hello TypePad.
[ link from dive into mark ]
The issue isn’t that Google retracted, but that there was no explanation, retraction notice, etc. At worst it creates a perception that what they said isn’t acceptable (for some reason, it’s a good comment) to the company. At even worst it shows a company who doesn’t understand that blogging at that level is like journalism: you have a responsibility.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Jeremy Wright on May 12, 2004 at 1:08 am, and is filed under Blogging. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site. |
Comments are closed.
about 7 years ago
Every successful corporate blog I know off is either written by the CEO or something similar and always saying that these are personal opinions. This is an unstated rule that really needs to be watched out for. A corporation can let their employees views out, show their culture, show their collective understanding, but this is not what the Googleblog is or ever was.
It was clearly written as “This is out (Google’s) opinion” and that was the problem, because that needs to go over the PR department no matter what.
about 7 years ago
Give them a break. We all write or say things we would agree sound stupid or insulting when heard later. As long as the author agreed to delete the paragraph himself, I see no problem with this.
Of course I am not up on the the emerging business-blogging rules, but common sense tells me it is okay to make sure you don’t sound like a jerk.
about 7 years ago
But they didn’t sound like jerks and there was no retraction. This is the official blog of Google. As such there’s no reason they shouldn’t be held to the same standards as other official blogs.
It’s especially “stinky” when the declared purpose is to be an off the cuff view into the world of Google.
Sounds like it’s more of a PR thing already, at least until we see differently.
about 7 years ago
Remeber, they are in the “quiet period” before an IPO. I can imagine this conversation:
Lawyer (over the phone): Hey, I noticed this outsourcing comment on the blog
Blogger: Yeah, so what? I stand by it.
Lawyer: You just gave away part of our business plan outside of SEC regulations during our quiet period.
Blogger: Oh, come on, talking about some minor outsourcing is no big deal and is a hot debate within the IT industry
Lawyer: Even small things like this could jeapardize our ability to go public, and the SEC is being extra vigilent after Enron and Martha, so this little comment could prevent us from going public and making you a rich man.
Blogger: I’ll take it down immediately
If you ever worked with lawyers, they always assume worst case scenarios.
Just a guess…